Under the Private Security and Investigative Services Act, 2005, who has the authority to establish a code of conduct by regulation?
Based on: s. 53 Code of conduct
Every private investigator in Ontario must follow the Code of Conduct in O. Reg. 363/07, made under the Private Security and Investigative Services Act, 2005. Section 53 of the Act lets the Minister establish the code by regulation and makes compliance a condition of every licence. The code sets positive duties, such as acting with honesty and integrity and keeping information confidential, and express prohibitions, such as being unfit for duty through alcohol or drugs. Breaching the code can cost you your licence.
Under the Private Security and Investigative Services Act, 2005, who has the authority to establish a code of conduct by regulation?
Based on: s. 53 Code of conduct
How does compliance with the code of conduct relate to a licence issued under the Act?
Based on: s. 53 Code of conduct
When is a licensee considered to be in breach of the code of conduct under O. Reg. 363/07?
Based on: O. Reg. 363/07, s. 1 Breach of code of conduct
Which of the following is a positive duty imposed on every individual licensee while working as a private investigator or security guard?
Based on: O. Reg. 363/07, s. 2(1) Individual licensees
Under the code of conduct, what must an individual licensee do with information received while working as a private investigator or security guard?
Based on: O. Reg. 363/07, s. 2(1) Individual licensees
The code of conduct requires individual licensees to treat all persons equally and prohibits discrimination. Which of the following grounds is included in that prohibition?
Based on: O. Reg. 363/07, s. 2(1) Individual licensees
Under the code of conduct, what is an individual licensee required to do with respect to the use of force while working?
Based on: O. Reg. 363/07, s. 2(1) Individual licensees
Which of the following conduct is expressly required of an individual licensee under the code of conduct with respect to behaviour generally?
Based on: O. Reg. 363/07, s. 2(1) Individual licensees
Under the code of conduct, which duty regarding law enforcement cooperation applies to every individual licensee?
Based on: O. Reg. 363/07, s. 2(1) Individual licensees
Under the code of conduct, what obligation does an individual licensee have regarding the use of profane or abusive language while working?
Based on: O. Reg. 363/07, s. 2(1) Individual licensees
The Code of Conduct is not optional guidance. Under s. 53 of the Act, the Minister may, by regulation, establish a code of conduct, and it is a condition of every licence issued under the Act that a licensee shall comply with it. That code is O. Reg. 363/07. Section 1 of the regulation defines the trigger for discipline plainly: a licensee is in breach of the code of conduct if the licensee contravenes or fails to comply with the Regulation. Because compliance is written into the licence itself, a breach is not merely bad manners; it is a failure of a licence condition that exposes you to the complaint and investigation process. The regulator's authority to make these and related rules is set out in the Act at s. 54(1)(a) to (h) and s. 54(1)(i) to (t).
Section 2(1) of O. Reg. 363/07 imposes a list of duties on every individual licensee while working as a private investigator or security guard. The licensee must act with honesty and integrity, and must respect and use all property and equipment in accordance with the conditions of the licence. The licensee must treat all persons equally without discrimination on grounds that include sexual orientation, among others listed in the code. On the privacy side, the licensee must respect the privacy of others by treating all information received while working as confidential, except where disclosure is required as part of such work or by law. The code also requires cooperating with police where it is required by law.
Alongside the duties, s. 2(2) and (3) of the regulation set out conduct that is flatly prohibited. An individual licensee must not be unfit for duty, while working, through consumption of alcohol or drugs. The licensee must not conspire with another person, or aid or abet another licensee, in a breach of the code of conduct, and must not wilfully or negligently make a false statement or complaint against another licensee. The code also prohibits misrepresenting to any person the type, class or conditions of the licence. That last prohibition carries a narrow exception in s. 2(3): it does not apply to an individual licensee who is concealing his or her identity as a private investigator or security guard in order to carry out his or her duties, which recognises the reality of undercover investigative work. Refraining from behaviour that is either prohibited or not authorized by law is also required under s. 2(1).
The Code of Conduct does not stop at individual licensees. Sections 3(1) and 3(2) of O. Reg. 363/07 apply the code to licensed business entities, so a company that sells the services of private investigators or security guards is itself bound and can itself breach the code. In practice this means an agency cannot escape responsibility by pointing at an individual employee: the entity carries its own duties under the regulation. The test sometimes contrasts the individual duties in s. 2 with the business entity duties in s. 3 to check that you know both exist. Keep the structure in mind: s. 2 governs the individual on the ground, and s. 3 governs the licensed business behind them, with s. 1 defining breach for both.
| Point | Individual licensee | Licensed business entity |
|---|---|---|
| Governing section | O. Reg. 363/07, s. 2(1) to (3) | O. Reg. 363/07, s. 3(1) and (2) |
| Act with honesty and integrity | Yes, s. 2(1) | Bound by the code as a whole, s. 3 |
| Refrain from unnecessary force | Yes, s. 2(1) | Applies through the entity's obligations, s. 3 |
| Unfit for duty through alcohol or drugs | Prohibited, s. 2(2) | Not the individual test; entity duties under s. 3 |
| Definition of breach | Contravening the Regulation, s. 1 | Contravening the Regulation, s. 1 |
| Ultimate source of authority | PSISA s. 53 and s. 54 | PSISA s. 53 and s. 54 |
In Ontario, s. 53 of the Private Security and Investigative Services Act, 2005 gives the Minister authority to establish a code of conduct by regulation, and that code is O. Reg. 363/07. Section 53 also makes compliance with the code a condition of every licence issued under the Act, so following the code is part of holding the licence.
In Ontario, the Code of Conduct in O. Reg. 363/07 requires every individual licensee to refrain from exercising unnecessary force under s. 2(1). The code does not grant any special force powers; it restrains you. Any force you do use is still governed by the Criminal Code, which permits only as much force as is necessary and makes you responsible for any excess.
Yes. In Ontario, s. 2(1) of the Code of Conduct (O. Reg. 363/07) requires an individual licensee to respect the privacy of others by treating all information received while working as confidential, except where disclosure is required as part of the work or by law. This duty sits alongside the federal privacy obligations a commercial investigator has under PIPEDA.
Sometimes. In Ontario, s. 2(2) of O. Reg. 363/07 prohibits misrepresenting the type, class or conditions of a licence, but s. 2(3) provides an exception: the prohibition does not apply to a licensee who is concealing their identity as a private investigator or security guard in order to carry out their duties. This recognises the reality of legitimate undercover work.
RiverMap Learning apps are independent study tools. They are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to any government body or examination authority. Question content is original and based on publicly available official study materials.